What the system does when pointed at a classroom instead of a business.
Teachers and organizations aren't the same audience, so they don't share a page. This one collects the classroom side: a reliability check run before any of this touched a real lesson, and two ready-to-run plans for an ELA / U.S. History unit on The Crucible — one using the hindrance-check track alone, one using both tracks together. Neither lesson plan has been taught to a real class yet; that's stated plainly on each page, not glossed over.
Worked demonstration — reliability dry run
Before proposing a classroom activity built on this mechanism, we built three independently-constructed stakeholder graphs of the same play and checked whether they'd agree. Most of it converged; one part didn't, and the page explains exactly why, at the same level of confidence the evidence actually supports.
Ready-to-run lesson plan
A two-period ELA / U.S. History lesson: small groups design their own replacement for the Salem court's evidentiary standard, test it against the play's real stakeholders, and compare results across the class. Exact timing, roles, and a rubric — nothing left for the teacher to improvise.
Ready-to-run lesson plan — comprehensive version
A three-period version that uses both halves of the system: every student owns one character and tests that character's own moral choice, then the class compiles everyone's work into a shared rights test on a rule the group writes together. Asks more of classroom time and technology than the shorter plan — the page says so up front.
A different kind of piece from the lesson plans above — not something a teacher runs in class, but a case study aimed at parents and the public: can the same hindrance-check machinery evaluate who should hold curriculum authority in the first place, not just how a given curriculum gets taught?
Governance case study
Every other case study on this site tests a rule already on the table. This one tests something more direct: a proposal that hands curriculum authority to the students, parents, and teachers who make up a school, and away from the distant bodies that currently write it — checked for whether it treats everyone it binds fairly, including the state department whose authority it takes away.
A different audience again — not a lesson plan for a whole class, but private prep for a team already building a case. Can this help a student find the gap in their own position before the round finds it for them?
Draft — internal review, not yet finalized
A real, live-run demonstration on Ethics Bowl Canada's own case library entry of the same name: a live Socratic dialogue, not just a verdict, showing what a team actually gets from using this to prepare that they might not get on their own. Still being edited; the link below may not be viewable until that's done.